home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: pangea.Stanford.EDU!karish
- From: karish@pangea.Stanford.EDU (Chuck Karish)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.edu
- Subject: Re: ANSI C and POSIX (was Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada)
- Date: 12 Apr 1996 18:46:45 GMT
- Organization: Mindcraft, Inc.
- Message-ID: <4km8el$3he@nntp.Stanford.EDU>
- References: <JSA.96Feb16135027@organon.com> <dewar.828757752@schonberg> <4kkbk7$hv8@nntp.Stanford.EDU> <4kkru5INN71j@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: pangea.stanford.edu
-
- In article <4kkru5INN71j@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca>,
- Kazimir Kylheku <c2a192@ugrad.cs.ubc.ca> wrote:
- >In article <4kkbk7$hv8@nntp.Stanford.EDU>,
- >Chuck Karish <karish@pangea.Stanford.EDU> wrote:
- >>Incorrect premise: Windows NT does conform to POSIX.1 and the
- >>US Government does buy it as a FIPS 151-2 conforming system.
- >
- >It does? You mean under NT, I could, say, disable the console echo by making
- >suitable changes to a ``struct termios'', and pass it to tcsetattr()?
- >Or send a SIGTSTP signal to the foreground process group from the controlling
- >terminal? Wow...
-
- Neither POSIX.1-1990 nor FIPS 151-2 requires that a conforming
- system support the POSIX.1 general terminal interface. Windows
- NT 3.51 does not do so.
- --
-
- Chuck Karish karish@mindcraft.com
- (415) 323-9000 x117 karish@pangea.stanford.edu
-